If Ruby is object-oriented Perl, then Reia is object-oriented Erlang
Besides Ruby-like syntax how does it differ from parametrized modules?
From his example:
= Reia:
= Erlang:class Foo def initialize(value) @value = value end def value @value end end
And it's actually prettier.-module(foo, [Value]). value() -> Value.Can you do some crazy pattern matching and type overloading like with Scala? Or is it just syntactic sugar for parametrized modules?
I wonder about "The canonical approach, Erlang records, are a goofy and oft reviled preprocessor construct with an unwieldy syntax." After writing a bit of Erlang code, I don't mind records that much. They're not prefect, but I would never call them bad, goofy, etc. They're also used in pretty much every situation where a state in a predefined form is needed (config files, server state, etc.) so that proplists are not needed (no need for dynamic list).
So... what is the complaint about records really?
The title is correct, albeit vacuously.
undefined
Clearly the author knows Erlang almost as well as he knows Perl.