moderating anti-science[1] content on a public access system is becoming more of a problem for me each day. it is less than encouraging to see these people lawyering! how i struggle to understand the point of view of someone who seeks to spread unsourced[2] material.

[1] as "pro-disease" [2] as "content presenting itself as layperson news on peer-reviewed science, when not only is there no peer, there's no scientist"