>> As usual when preparing Tor Browser releases, we verified that the build is bit-for-bit reproducible. While we managed to get two matching builds, we found that in some occasions the builds differ (we found this happening on the Linux i686 and macOS bundles). We are still investigating the cause of this issue to fix it.

I find this quite fascinating. Does anyone have any ideas for how this could happen? My understanding was that if you run the same compiler on the same code, you get the same executables. What could be going on?

How do I quickly check if my Tor Browser is up to date without the Onion button?

Either I'm getting old or I'm using too many different systems and programs because these little UI changes start to bother me.

Dont be surprised by the letterboxing

Try the BBC News (mentioned the other day) at Bbcnewsv2vjtpsuy.onion

More people should use tor

Does this fix any of tptacek’s issues with the Tor Browser?

undefined

It's working way better than a couple of years ago. Even Google seems to load. Congrats!

Is there any reason that’s not buying drugs or worse to use this? Honest question.

Excellent solution for pedophiles and other garbage. Not so good news for the rest of us.

> Clarified the amount of locales we support. It's 32

Wait a minute, does TB use a 5-bit number to enumerate the locales? You'd think that nowadays they would opt for something larger.

I would love to use Tor but I don't want to touch anything illegal. Ever. Is it possible?

Is there some index, directory or search engine curated with this in mind?

Edit: I didn't mean to make anyone feel offended and I sorry. I will take more care when asking questions like this in the future. Thank you all for your compression