"I think Microsoft today is a lot like IBM was in 1985. When I started my career IBM dominated the tech world."

In the entire article, this is the only comparison he makes to IBM. He follows with zero support for the argument. It may not be a bad article, but its a misleading title. I worked at IBM starting in '87. I was expecting some meaningful content from someone that knew what it was like working at IBM in '85, but nothing provided.

The headline is misleading. He's pretty balanced in his views on Microsoft and Google.