Correct me if I'm wrong, but they were to be given an award that was then revoked, correct? They weren't banned from the show floor, were they?

If so, then this isn't really the obvious double-standard the article makes it out to be unless the male sex products are winning awards without the "no sex products" rule being applied to them as well. If anything it seems in line with their push to have sexual things present but not featured.

wonder if abusing on the marketing material on purpose to be 'banned' is a marketing strategy nowadays. It surely got them a spot on HN after all!

Thank god for these pioneers.

I'm surprised by CES's response - when did teledildonics become a moral issue?

undefined