Quebec's National Assembly continues, focus shifts to religious symbols bill

  • The title of this submission broke the site guidelines quite badly. They ask: "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." We take away submission privileges from accounts that do that, so please don't do that.

    Submitted title was "Québec will ban hijab & other religious symbols to be worn by govt. employees."

  • The title of this link is so grossly sensationalized. Nothing has been set yet, and Quebec hasn't banned anything. Politicians just proposed a bill and will likely face steep opposition since this sort of thing has happened before.

    In Canada, everyone must wear helmets when operating a motorcycle; riders who wore turbans were exempt from this rule. A bill was proposed to ratify the exemption, ppl cited discrimination and the bill was shot down.

  • It's disgusting, and most of the rest of Canada is against it.

    The part that really bugs me about it is that Christian symbols are allowed- because that's "a part of our culture".

  • undefined

  • > The Coaliton Avenir Québec government wants to pass a bill today that will bar public-school teachers, government lawyers, judges and police officers from wearing religious symbols while at work.

    > The bill also invokes the notwithstanding clause in an effort to spare it from court challenges about its constitutionality.

  • undefined

  • If Quebec wants to ban "religious symbols" for its govt. employees, then they must affirmatively put forth a strict "this is what _everyone_ must wear" uniform similar to grade school/military codes. I personally wouldn't have a problem with that, but I wonder if that could pass through the political process (hence this backdoor bill shenanigans I suppose).