Let's discuss the source for the GPLed parts of Tesla cars
Some time ago there was a story about how BMW sent a DVD to a guy who asked for the GPL software in his i3 (BMW's electric car)[1]. It was also discussed on HN [2].
[1] https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2016/03/bmw-are-complying-with-the-...
Chucked over an email.
Not sure if this is specifically relevant, but just in case, I have a (minor) commit in BusyBox which is licensed under GPLv2.
I'd love to have Tesla send me my source. ;)
Has anybody emailed Musk directly about this? As somebody who made his money on the back of the tech industry he should get the need to give back.
Honest question: if someone modifies the software of their car, will it still be street-legal?
Unfortunately, this is par for the course for any large public "tech" company. Releasing their source proactively isn't a source of profit so it is simply not done until people have to beg for it.
When will you be able to hack your car to get better performance? EVs kinda take the hotrodding fun out of cars. Being able to play with the software would bring a part of it back.
GPL is transitive, so does that mean all software in the Tesla becomes GPL? If not, please explain. GPL has no linkage/classpath exception.
Just curious what prohibits Tesla to stop shipping updates for owners who will demand sources?
Even with source how does one relink their GPL'ed code and replace the Tesla binaries?
This is why the GPL is toxic. If you include it your software someone can request your source code and then compile it and release it for free.
This will probably get downvoted, but this kind of thing is why companies avoid the GPL. There will be people inside the company saying they would not be having these issues if they'd have used a BSD based OS (like Sony, Apple, etc) or a completely closed source OS.