Who are pt-ziegen and blord? They appear to have come out of the woodwork to give you effusive praise.

The first thing that comes to mind is uTest (http://www.utest.com/). It does the similar type of crowdsourcing, but the quality of the testers we experienced were pretty horrible (with a few exceptions).

The guaranteed video of the testing process is an interesting idea - it's a lot slower to review video testing on the developer's side, but having video really would have helped clear up some of the issues that were reported to us.

The main problems we had with uTest were 1) the inconsistent tester quality and 2) the horrible test cycle management interface. It seems you could easily beat #1, and #2 is just some coding away.

The video shows someone testing the user experience but what about a structured functionality test amongst a set of devices. If I were using the service I would like to provide a checklist and see you go through that checklist on a set of devices and OS versions that I would provide.

undefined

This looks really nice. I don't really care about the videos, in fact, but just knowing if a complex NDK app (VLC, for me) runs on different devices (and Android version) would just be great too.

As long as everyone complains about Android fragmentation, I think you will have a market.

If I was you I would improve the video.

somehow, I think DeviceAnywhere.com is a much better solution for the same problem. Yes, it's slow most of the times, but they have a plethora of devices to test on and you can test the app however you want.

Excellent Service!!! Really value for money!! Congrats!

Really fantastic!!! An easy way to get these things done!!!