I found this to be really annoying! You're presented with such ridiculously selective and misleading information on the two innovations. You're then coaxed into making the apparently wrong choice of innovation.

Who makes decisions based on such little info anyway? And the info presented was the choice of the author.

Then... the rest of the post basically says don't make decisions based on such little information! I found that pretty pointless.

Finding a flipside though, this guy's creating a demand for his own content by offering a question with a seemingly obvious answer then shaking it up with new info. That I like: create a problem which you then solve.