The charts presented in this article seem designed to be misleading - different scales, and large offsets from zero designed to make small absolute differences look large. Of course, I wouldn't expect anything less from a blatant ad for interviewing prep from interviewing.io

This article sucks. Those graphs are horribly misleading, it's just a blatant ad.

One of the things I don't understand about hn is that advertisements with only sensational content like this can easily get on the front page. Is it because people just looked at the content title and voted?

Why do these graphs all start in 2022? It's impossible to put this into perspective with so little data. Is the market more difficult than 2020? How about 2016? How about 2014?

The companies they picked for this analysis makes me seriously doubt this is representative of most of the market for tech jobs.

Seems like you have a larger pool of potential customers so i'll take this as a well time ad. Nothing about free prep sessions or guidance to actually help folks, might lead to a better ad consider the response here.

Just a thought, it's gonna be a bumpy ride. Roci out.

blogspam is now allowed in HN?

flagged

I Doubt this is measurable