> "I'm concerned you're ... encouraging anyone who has a large deposit at a community bank to say, 'we're not going to make you whole, but if you go to one of our preferred banks, we will make you whole.'"

"That's certainty not something that we're encouraging," Yellen replied.

They’re not encouraging people to act in their own self-interest while knowing full well that’s the reality they just created. I have to wonder where she tells her family and friends to bank?

Frankly they should be, as this is the de facto situation that has been created. Extend the FDIC's scope to all accounts. Create new tiers for larger accounts, with their own funds/levies based on their increased variance. Increase capital requirements on banks, and introduce criminal penalties for bank executives that blow through the capital buffer, lose customer deposits, and end up requiring the government backstop. The industry has created these entities that are too big to fail, it's time they were regulated as such.

*for future bank failures

missed that bit in the headline there. This makes sense because SVB had a liquidity issue, which is easy enough to clean up without getting your hands too dirty. Other banks may fail differently.

All uninsured depositors are equal, but some uninsured depositors are more equal than others.

For some additional context, here is an excerpt from the hearing:

https://twitter.com/SeidlerCorp/status/1636518949872451584?s...

Here is my question:

Certain individuals have argued on HN that depositors of SVB should be made whole. For the most part, their arguments have not been based on systemic banking risk. Rather, their arguments have been based on the negative impact of employers suffering losses on uninsured deposits.

Would these same people argue that deposits of, say, community banks in Oklahoma be fully insured? Do they disagree with Yellen?

I honestly can’t believe that government agencies can operate in this broad scope without further checks and balances. It is ripe for corruption , favoritism, and elitism. The fed needs checks on its power.

This feels less like a free market and more like a game.

Keep them guessing and let some fail to keep them somewhat honest. Though looks like the right calls from the right people to the right people can make things happen.

It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.