Condoms not effective against HPV or herpes
There is no scientific proof Hep C can be sexually transmitted, many studies have concluded [0]. It's a little concerning the author of the article, an OB/GYN doctor, is asserting otherwise.
My British education, from the 90's, taught me the risks of HSV and HPV transmission occurring despite barrier methods (condoms). I'm assuming seeing as this is being voted up that this isn't something taught in America?
There is but one relevant scientifically proven fact in the article (with no citation): "UCSF researchers have shown these viruses to be present on genital skin with no symptoms that might prompt diagnosis and treatment." Everything else relevant to the thesis is speculation and commentary.
Largely overlooked is that unprotected oral sex isn't really safe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexually_transmitted_disease#Tr...
Sheesh, I didn't even know it was possible for males to be vaccinated against HPV. How is that not a good idea?
So, we are back to this, hum:
"Yet if we acquire a lifelong viral "souvenir" through sex, may it be from a person who is important forever. It's a minimal-regrets way to assess the value of a relationship before risking exposure. When it comes to viral STDs, the devil is in the details."
There are many STIs worse than herpes. Find your condom size: http://luckybloke.com/pages/find-your-condom-size and use quality condoms that don't distract from your enjoyment. (Especially helpful if you find condoms too loose or tight.) Better than gonorrhea or AIDS any day.
> Experts say being exposed to at least one STD virus is virtually inevitable
If you are promiscuous of course, for those who don't the chance is almost cero.