It looks interesting (We found a compromised CDn used by afghan government sites that delivers malicious code - it's is suspiciously like others we vaguely linked to China)

But, where is the cert number or other, peer reviewed verification. There is a lot of leaping to conclusions here (I really don't get the "time stamp on compromised file is same as on a photo of Chinese diplomat." Unless the attack originated from a journalists machine this seems trivial coincidence)

It is, without deeper knowledge of the area, a I am sure well researched but suspiciously biased article.